ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The proliferation of improvised masks during the COVID-19 pandemic has raised questions regarding filter effectiveness and safety. We sought to compare the effectiveness of commonly used improvised filter materials against N95 industry standards. METHODS: Six different filter materials commonly used in the community were tested using both single- and multi-layer configurations with the TSI 8130 automated filter tester in accordance with National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) standards for N95 respirators. RESULTS: Only three of the tested filter material configurations met N95 parameters with regard to filtration efficiency and pressure drop across the filter material-the: True-high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filter, four-layer MERV 13 and 14 HVAC filters. CONCLUSIONS: Many proposed filter materials for improvised masks do not meet current industry standards and may pose safety and efficacy concerns. Care should be taken when selecting materials for this critical respirator component, particularly for health care workers or others at high risk for pathogen exposure.
Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Inhalation Exposure/prevention & control , Masks/standards , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Occupational Health , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Air Pollutants, Occupational/analysis , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Equipment Design , Equipment Safety , Female , Global Health , Health Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Materials Testing , National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, U.S./standards , Pandemics/statistics & numerical data , Particle Size , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Quality Assurance, Health Care/standards , United StatesABSTRACT
The use of surgical sterilization wrap for respirator masks during the COVID-19 crisis has become a popularized personal protective equipment alternative option due to claims supporting its ability to meet N95 standards. This study sought to assess these claims using standardized filter testing. The tested material failed to meet N95 standards and suggests its use may place medical personnel at increased risk of harm when managing COVID-19 patients.